Posted in Contact Improvisation, Research Lab, Touch

Week 7: Integration – going up and coming down

Through our practice we were given the incredible opportunity to travel to Nottingham’s Dance4 studio to take part in a workshop with Feet off the Ground Dance. The change of environment and new movement material had a clear impact on everyone’s confidence. The positive atmosphere led to some incredible work being performed and allowed us to work strongly as a collective. Applying the techniques we learnt throughout the class into a piece of repertoire, really gave us the confidence to let go of any preconceptions and put everything we had into the movement, “the dance was within us” (Curtis, 1988, p.156). Having these additional techniques has allowed me to be less anxious about entering contact jams and has pushed me to want to experimenting working with new people.

0416E387-4C21-447C-B2C4-218D24800EF2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How does a change of pace and momentum affect the movement created during contact improvisation?

Exercise 1: Slow paced movement, starting on a low kinesphere. The aim of the exercise is to allow the dancers to explore all the different points for rolling, anchoring, levering and weight bearing. Discovering new platforms that could be used on different kinesphere or when travelling, “each body […] is unique and presents another opportunity to explore what movement is available” (Curtis, 1988, p.157).

CI exercise 1

Exercise 2: Travelling across the room. Exercise begins slow paced and is restricted to low and middle kinesphere. The exercise the progresses to fact paced movement and the higher kinesphere is opened up. We wanted to take away thinking time so that there would be no pauses in the movement, “I found my body starting to move in patterns that did not exist in my mind or in my previous experience” (Curtis, 1988, p.156) The aim is that the movement is not rushed, it is just a continuous flow of movement “[…] the internal rhythm of shifting weight, sensation and the communication that goes back and forth between the dancers” (Curtis, 1988, p.158)

travelling fast

 

Overall Feedback

cropped-257BFE08-FB3B-41DA-A9C9-E9C1440F7609.png

Did you prefer moving at a slower pace and did it help you find more anchor points?
The slower paced movement helped the dancers explore new points of connection and new movement material. The overall feeling of both exercises seemed to stay at a slower pace, even when bodies should have been moving quicker. The participant explained this was because the movement felt more fluid.

 

Did the change of pace affect the momentum?
The dancers explained that they found it difficult to go from two slow paced exercises into a quick on with a partner. They suggested that a solo fast paced exercised may have encouraged their movement when in a duet. The music was complement as it helped lift the atmosphere and did have an effect on the movement. The quicker pace led to some difficulty getting started and a demonstration helped to make it clear on what movement was available. There was much more communication in this exercise to keep surrounding people safe.

 

Does changing pace steer you away from habitual movement?

Our peer discussed that the found it difficult to move at a fast pace because they couldn’t explore the movement. It was made clear that they would become stuck in certain kinesphere’s i.e. bodysurfing, because they forgot about the other possibilities and techniques we had learnt. An overload of things to think about caused a physical block and put everybody’s movement on hold, “when we don’t make fences around our bodies, all movement becomes acceptable” (Curtis, 1988, p.158)

 

Bibliography: Curtis, B. (1988). Exposed to Gravity. Contact Quarterly/ Contact Improvisation Sourcebook I, Vol. 13. Pp.156-162.

Posted in Contact Improvisation, Research Lab, Sensorium, Small Dance, Touch

Week 4: Sharing Gravity

Csikszentmihalyi says ‘… to pursue mental operations to any depth, a person has to learn to concentrate attention and that without this sense of focus, consciousness remains in a state of chaos.’ (Csikszentmihalyi 1997:26). At the beginning of each contact jam my mind has felt in a complete state of chaos, placing barriers and negative thoughts towards movement before I have even begun. This week I allowed my mind to relate back to my readings and enabled my body to put into practice the knowledge I have been gaining, to push my body through the limitations and restrictions I create for myself each week. This formed a higher level of trust within myself and with my peers and enabled me to lift and be lifted with confidence, experimenting with things I would have been hesitant towards previously.

How does sensory knowledge impact the way we communicate through contact improvisation?

We decided to base our research lab around Banon & Holt’s journal “Touch: Experience and Knowledge”. The exercises we constructed aimed “to explore the complex intermingling of experience, perception and knowledge in relation to our human understandings of touch” (Bannon and Holt, 215, 2012) and help us to come to a closer understanding of ‘how sensory knowledge impact’s the way we communicate through contact improvisation’.

image1

Banana Roll: The aim of this exercises was to allow the rolling participant to feel all sensations of the body whilst being assisted by a partner. “As the significance of action is from moment to moment, at a distance the activity has little meaning or shape.” (Brown, 1980-81, 74) Taking away the need to move one’s own body gives us the opportunity to track through and make an embodied connection with each point of contact we can feel, whether it is with material or another body.

Through observation it was clear which partners allowed their body to be completely relaxed and entrusted their partner with the movement. Occasionally the bottom half of the body was much easier to relax, if the body wasn’t in complete relaxation, the partner laying often found themselves stuck in one position.

Feedback:
Did you find it challenging or easy to release whilst being assisted by another body?
We received fixed feedback in regards to how it felt to release. Many thought it was easy to relax into the flow of the movement and allow their partners to be in complete control, whilst others found it difficult not to initiate the movement themselves from the points of contact.

Were you able to sense what areas of your body were making contact with the floor whilst being assisted by another body?
It was interesting to hear how the movement felt opposed to how it looked. The people who were rolling described the exercise as distracting and reported that it was often confusing as to where the points of touch were coming from, which led to a disconnection of focus at moments throughout.

Sensorium: “The sensory apparatus of the body as a whole; the seat of physical sensation, imagined to be in grey matter of the brain.” The aim of this exercise was to put restrictions of movement into the body and encourage partners to explore contact through parts of the body that may usually be neglected due to difficulty, ‘defying boundaries in response to sensory information’. (Bannon and Holt, 2012) We wanted the dancers to focus on the smaller sensations and points of contact rather than overall movement enabling “awareness of the small dance implies the opening of freer communication throughout the body” (Brown, 1980-81, 75).

What were the sensation that you felt when tracking through the body, connected to your partner?
The group described that they found it quite difficult to track through the body whilst moving and that there was a limited range of movements that could be performed when restrictions were put in place, so movement often became lost and bodies got stuck in certain positions.

Did you find the limitations restricting or did they assist in exploration throughout the body?
The group expressed that the limitations we put into place were difficult however it restricted habitual movement as all the movement being explored was new and nothing could be repeated. This new found range of movement also enabled them to discover that most of their movement initiated from the pelvis and this allowed for a firm, natural base for weight bearing movements.

Overall Feedback:

Do you have a better awareness of how sensory knowledge transmit through the body and how would you apply this through contact improvisation?

Our overall feedback was quite positive, although the initial exercises proved difficult for the group the information they took out of it will be beneficial towards the rest of their practice. The expressed that our research lab made them aware that simplifying exercises and allowing their bodies to feel the sensations of small dance will initiate movement naturally rather than delving straight in with complex phrases and getting stuck. This new found knowledge has helped with exploration of movement and steered the body away from the habitual.

 

Bibliography:
Bannon, Fiona; Holt, Duncan. (2012) Touch: Experience and knowledge, Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices Vol. 3. pp. 215 – 227
Brown, B. Is Contact a Small Dance? Contact Improvisation Sourcebook I. Vol. 6
Paxton, S. (2009) Small Dance. Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sJKEXUtv44 [accessed 18 October 2016].
Sensing weight in movement’. Full text available By: Ravn, Susanne Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices, 2010, Vol. 2 Issue 1
Sensorium. (n.d.) American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. (2011). Retrieved October 12th 2016 from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/sensorium
Integration Training (2013) Contact improvisation rolling exercise. Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ7WLqpR2qI [accessed 12 October 2016].